Summary cards
The cards at the top give a quick snapshot of the period:- PRs Closed — total PRs closed across all visible engineers
- Avg Cycle Time — median cycle time averaged across engineers
- Review Turnaround — median time-to-first-review averaged across engineers
- PRs Reviewed — total review participation
- Avg Merge Rate — average merge rate across engineers
- Unreviewed Merges — how many merged PRs shipped with zero reviews (and the % of merges)
- Review Depth — median comments per merged PR
Investment mix
The investment mix, its weekly trend, and effort-by-initiative live together on the Investment & Cost page (Business section of the sidebar), scoped by the same team filter.Per-engineer table
The table below breaks down every metric by engineer. Click any column header to sort. Click any engineer row to drill into their individual view. Use the search box to filter the table by name without changing the summary cards. A 🔥 overload flag appears next to any engineer whose open-PR count exceeds your org’s burnout threshold — a protective signal that someone may be juggling too much, not a performance mark.Charts
Four charts visualize the team breakdown:- PRs Closed vs Reviewed — who’s authoring vs reviewing
- Cycle Time & First Review — time-based comparison across engineers
- Lines Changed — change volume by engineer (context for PR size, not a score)
- PR Size Distribution — stacked bar showing each engineer’s size habits
DevPerform intentionally does not rank engineers against each other — there are no “fastest” or “most output” leaderboards. Per-person data exists for an engineer’s own self-view and for protective signals like the overload flag. See our team-health stance.